Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) Toyota ₱3,839,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | — | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3496cc | 2982cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Twin-turbo, Intercooled | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 410 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 10-speed A/T | 5-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5636 | 4840 |
| Width (mm) | 2029 | 1885 |
| Height (mm) | 1938 | 1890 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3343 | 2790 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 87 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Suspension | Double Wishbone Independent Suspension with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Suspension | 4-Link Type Suspension with Stabilizer |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | — | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | — | 265/60 R 18 |
| Rear Tires | — | 265/60 R 18 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Air Conditioning | — | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Seat Material | — | Leather |
| Parking Brake | — | Manual |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Headlights | — | LED+Projector |
Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers prioritizing budget and everyday use, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel offers better value. At ₱3,839,000 versus ₱4,258,000 for the Ford Expedition, the Prado is significantly cheaper. Its 163 PS is sufficient for most daily driving, while the Expedition’s 375 PS makes it better suited for demanding off-road tasks. The Prado’s 2+3+2 seating is adequate for families, whereas the Expedition’s 2+3+3 capacity accommodates larger groups. Given the Prado’s lower operating cost and reliability track record, it’s the smarter first choice for the average user. The Expedition excels when hauling heavy loads or tackling rugged terrain, but the Prado’s broader appeal and affordability make it the more practical daily driver.