Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) Mazda ₱3,780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | — | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3496cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Twin-turbo, Intercooled | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm | 300.9 PS |
| Max Torque | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 603 Nm |
| Transmission | 10-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 5636 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 2029 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1938 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3343 | 3120 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 74 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 21 |
| Front Tires | — | 275/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | — | 275/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Air Conditioning | — | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Seat Material | — | Leather |
| Parking Brake | — | EPB |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 12 |
| Lighting | ||
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Headlights | — | LED |
Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and everyday practicality, the Mazda CX‑90 2024 emerges as the more sensible choice for most families, while the 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX suits those who need sheer torque and a traditional body‑on‑frame SUV for heavy loads. The CX‑90 is roughly ₱480,000 cheaper (₱3.78 million vs ₱4.258 million) and offers a modern unibody crossover platform that is generally easier to maneuver in city traffic. Its 300.9 PS output and 603 Nm torque are respectable, though lower than the Expedition’s 375 PS and 640 Nm, but the CX‑90’s turbocharged inline‑4 is likely more fuel‑efficient for daily commuting. Both carry the same 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Expedition’s 10‑speed automatic and 4WD system give it a rugged edge for off‑road or towing heavy trailers, aided by its body‑on‑frame construction and 5‑door, 2+3+3 seating layout. The CX‑90 seats seven in a conventional 3‑row layout, offers more contemporary exterior color options, and its unibody design provides a smoother ride for urban use. Choose the Expedition if you prioritize maximum power, towing capacity and a classic SUV feel; choose the CX‑90 if you want lower price, better city friendliness and sufficient power for typical family duties.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑90 2024 is cheaper at ₱3,780,000 compared to the Ford Expedition 2018 priced at ₱4,258,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Expedition produces 375 PS, while the Mazda CX‑90 delivers 300.9 PS, making the Expedition more powerful.
Is the Ford Expedition better for towing or heavy loads?
Yes; its 4WD drivetrain, body‑on‑frame construction and higher torque (640 Nm) give it an advantage for towing and heavy‑load tasks.
Which SUV is more suitable for daily city driving?
The Mazda CX‑90, with its unibody crossover design, lower price, and likely better fuel efficiency, is more suited for everyday urban commuting.