Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024) Mazda ₱3,880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | — | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3496cc | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 12:1 |
| Aspiration | Twin-turbo, Intercooled | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm | 284 PS @ 5000 - 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 450 Nm @ 2000 - 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 10-speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5636 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 2029 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1938 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3343 | 3120 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 74 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 21 |
| Front Tires | — | 275/45/R21 |
| Rear Tires | — | 275/45/R21 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Air Conditioning | — | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Seat Material | — | Leather |
| Parking Brake | — | EPB |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 12 |
| Lighting | ||
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Headlights | — | LED |
Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱4,258,000 versus ₱3,880,000 for the Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024). The Expedition offers significantly more power (375 PS vs 284 PS) and a longer 100,000km warranty, while the CX-90's AWD and newer build provide additional versatility. However, the CX-90's lower price and AWD capability make it preferable for buyers prioritizing off-road performance or daily commuting in varied terrain. The Expedition's 5+3+2 seating layout and 4WD drivetrain suit families needing extra space and traction, whereas the CX-90's 5-door design and 8-speed transmission appeal to those valuing efficiency and comfort. Ultimately, choose the Expedition if budget allows and you need commanding power and durability; opt for the CX-90 for better value and AWD capability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024) costs ₱3,880,000, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) is ₱4,258,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) produces 375 PS, while the Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024) delivers 284 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo Exclusive (2024) has AWD and an 8-speed transmission, which may offer better efficiency for daily use compared to the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)'s 10-speed transmission.
What is the warranty duration?
Both vehicles come with a 3-years/100,000km warranty.