Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 | Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱9,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 2 years |
| Availability | — | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3496cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Twin-turbo, Intercooled | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm | 360 PS |
| Max Torque | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 800 Nm |
| Transmission | 10-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Sedan |
| Segment | J | Sedan |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5636 | 5223 |
| Width (mm) | 2029 | 1923 |
| Height (mm) | 1938 | 1512 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3343 | 3210 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Graphite Grey Metallic, Polar White, Obsidian Black, Onyx Black Metallic, Nautical Blue Metallic, Sonoran Brown Metallic, Twilight Blue Metallic, Cirrus Silver Metallic, Moonlight White Metallic, Patagonia Red Metallic, Silicon Grey, China Blue, Kalahari |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2610 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Suspension | Multi-link with Airmatic |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Suspension | Multi-link with Airmatic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 21 |
| Front Tires | — | 255/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | — | 255/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Air Conditioning | — | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Seat Material | — | Leather |
| Parking Brake | — | EPB |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 15 |
| Lighting | ||
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Headlights | — | LED |
Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 450 4Matic AMG Line (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a massive, off‑road‑capable SUV against a futuristic luxury sedan, the choice hinges on budget, space needs and power source. The 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX costs ₱4.258 million, less than half the price of the 2024 Mercedes‑Benz EQS 450 4Matic, which is priced at ₱9.99 million. The Expedition offers a 3.5 L twin‑turbo V6 delivering 375 PS and 640 Nm, paired with a 10‑speed automatic and 4WD, making it suitable for families needing three rows (2+3+3 seats), cargo volume and rugged capability, especially on uneven Philippine roads. Its body‑on‑frame construction and 5‑door layout add durability and practicality. Conversely, the EQS provides an electric drivetrain with 360 PS, a higher torque of 800 Nm, and AWD, delivering instant acceleration and zero‑emission driving, but it seats only five and is a unibody sedan, limiting passenger capacity and off‑road use. The EQS also carries a shorter 2‑year warranty versus the Expedition’s 3‑year/100,000 km coverage. If you prioritize space, towing, and a lower upfront cost, the Expedition is the pragmatic pick. If you value cutting‑edge electric technology, premium sedan comfort and are willing to invest significantly more, the EQS suits you better.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX is priced at ₱4,258,000, while the 2024 Mercedes‑Benz EQS 450 4Matic costs ₱9,990,000, making the Expedition considerably cheaper.
Which model offers more power?
The Expedition’s twin‑turbo V6 produces 375 PS, whereas the EQS electric motor delivers 360 PS, so the Expedition has slightly higher peak power.
Is the Ford Expedition more practical for families?
Yes; it has three rows of seats (2+3+3), a 5‑door body‑on‑frame SUV layout and a longer wheelbase (5,636 mm), providing more passenger and cargo space than the five‑seat sedan EQS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the city?
The electric Mercedes‑Benz EQS, with its zero‑emission powertrain, compact sedan dimensions and AWD, is more suited for urban commuting, while the larger, fuel‑burning Expedition is less maneuverable in city traffic.