Honda CR-V 2.0 S CVT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 S CVT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 S CVT (2018) Honda ₱1,648,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Natural Aspirated i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 154 PS @ 6500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 189 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4571 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1657 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1505 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 57 | 65 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 235/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 235/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-V 2.0 S CVT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 S CVT and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T serve entirely different purposes. The CR-V is a crossover SUV priced at ₱1,648,000, offering 154 PS and 189 Nm from a 2.0L diesel engine with CVT and FWD. It seats 5, has unibody construction, and is better suited for daily commuting, family use, and comfort. The NV350 Urvan, at ₱1,570,000, is a body-on-frame van with a 2.5L turbo diesel producing 129 PS but a substantial 356 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed manual and RWD. It’s designed for heavy hauling and passenger transport, likely seating more than 5 (data not specified). For a Filipino buyer who needs a practical, powerful, and comfortable daily driver for urban and highway use, the CR-V is the better choice due to its higher power, CVT smoothness, and crossover versatility. However, if your priority is maximum torque for cargo or group transport, and you prefer a rugged, utilitarian vehicle, the NV350 offers more torque at a lower price. The CR-V also has a slight edge in warranty coverage (3 years/100,000 km). Ultimately, the decision hinges on your primary use: personal/family comfort (CR-V) versus commercial/load-carrying (NV350).
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Honda CR-V or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,570,000 compared to the Honda CR-V at ₱1,648,000.
Which has more power: CR-V or NV350?
The Honda CR-V has higher horsepower at 154 PS, while the Nissan NV350 has more torque (356 Nm vs 189 Nm) and uses a turbocharged engine.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-V is better for daily commuting due to its CVT transmission, FWD, unibody construction, and crossover comfort. The NV350 is a manual van designed for heavier work.
Which has better torque for hauling?
The Nissan NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm at low rpm) thanks to its turbocharged diesel, making it better for hauling heavy loads.