Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) Chevrolet ₱1,949,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1199cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 137 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 220 Nm @ 2500 - 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4537 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 2035 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1567 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 50 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sharkskin, Summit White, Cacti Green, Blue Glow Metallic, Jinx Metallic, Tigerlily Metallic, Tripp Metallic, Ziggy Solid, Black Meet Kettle |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1345 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18" alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT and the 2024 Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS hinges on priorities. The mu-X is significantly more affordable at ₱1,845,000 vs. ₱1,949,000 for the Trax. It also offers superior power (177 PS, 380 Nm from its 3.0L diesel) and torque, making it ideal for towing, off-road use, or carrying heavy loads. Its RWD drivetrain and larger SUV body (4,825mm long) provide ruggedness and space for five. However, the mu-X is older (2018 model) with a shorter 3-year warranty. In contrast, the Trax is a newer (2024) compact crossover with a 5-year warranty, a more fuel-efficient 1.2L turbo gasoline engine (137 PS, 220 Nm), and FWD—better for daily city commuting and easier parking. The Trax also offers more modern exterior color options. If you need diesel torque and a cheaper price, choose the mu-X. If you value modern design, warranty, and city-friendly driving, pick the Trax.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Chevrolet Trax which costs ₱1,949,000, a difference of ₱104,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu-X is more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, while the Chevrolet Trax has 137 PS and 220 Nm. The mu-X's diesel engine provides much higher torque, especially at low RPM.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Chevrolet Trax is generally better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, lighter gasoline engine (likely better fuel economy), and FWD layout, making it easier to maneuver and park in the city.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Chevrolet Trax offers a longer warranty of 5 years or 100,000 km, whereas the Isuzu mu-X has a 3-year or 100,000 km warranty.