Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 AT (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 AT (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 AT (2023) Ford ₱1,864,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2250 |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4904 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 2201 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2900 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Snowflake White Pearl/Arctic White, Absolute Black, Meteor Grey, Aluminum Metallic, Equinox Bronze, Blue Lightning, Sedona Orange |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2201 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/65/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/65/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 AT (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and practicality, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) edges out the Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 (2023) on price and outright power, while the Everest wins on warranty coverage, seating capacity and newer styling. The mu‑X is priced at ₱1,845,000, about ₱19,000 cheaper than the Everest, and delivers a slightly higher peak output of 177 PS (versus 170 PS) though its torque is lower (380 Nm vs 405 Nm). If you prioritize a lower purchase price and a bit more top‑end power for occasional highway runs, the Isuzu is the better pick. However, the Everest offers a longer 5‑year/150,000 km warranty compared with Isuzu’s 3‑year/100,000 km, a five‑door layout and a 7‑seat configuration, making it more family‑oriented and future‑proof for daily commuting or road trips. Both share a 6‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel drive, but the Everest’s newer 2023 model may also bring updated interior refinements not listed here. Choose the Isuzu if budget and marginally higher power matter most; choose the Ford if you need a longer warranty, extra seats and a newer model year for everyday versatility.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared with the Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Trend 4×2 (2023) priced at ₱1,864,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X produces 177 PS, slightly more than the Ford Everest’s 170 PS, though the Everest has higher torque at 405 Nm versus 380 Nm.
Which model offers a better warranty?
The Ford Everest provides a longer warranty of 5 years or 150,000 km, whereas the Isuzu mu‑X comes with a 3‑year or 100,000 km warranty.
Which SUV is more practical for a large family?
The Ford Everest seats up to seven (2+3+2) with five doors, making it more suitable for larger families than the Isuzu mu‑X, which seats five (2+3) and has four doors.