Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | J | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 3270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1953 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 16 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/70/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/70/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000 and the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4x2 A/T (2023) at ₱1,820,000, the newer Ranger offers better value. It is ₱25,000 cheaper, has a longer 5-year/150,000km warranty versus 3-year/100,000km, and produces more torque (405 Nm vs 380 Nm) despite lower power (170 PS vs 177 PS). The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup, ideal for work and off-road use, while the mu-X is an SUV with a more car-like ride and seating for 5. If you prioritize a modern vehicle with a stronger warranty and higher torque for hauling or towing, choose the Ranger. If you prefer an SUV body style for daily driving and occasional off-road, and don’t mind an older model, the mu-X remains a solid choice. Note that the mu-X has a larger 3.0L engine, but fuel efficiency details are not provided. Overall, the Ranger wins on price, warranty, and torque output.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Isuzu mu-X or Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4x2 A/T (2023) is cheaper at ₱1,820,000, while the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) costs ₱1,845,000.
Which has more power: mu-X or Ranger?
The Isuzu mu-X produces higher maximum power at 177 PS, while the Ford Ranger makes 170 PS. However, the Ranger has higher torque at 405 Nm versus the mu-X's 380 Nm.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The Ford Ranger offers a longer warranty: 5 years or 150,000 km, compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 3 years or 100,000 km.
Is the mu-X better for daily commuting than the Ranger?
The mu-X is an SUV with a more comfortable ride for passengers, while the Ranger is a pickup truck designed for utility. For daily commuting on paved roads, the mu-X may be more suitable, but the Ranger's newer features and lower price could also appeal.