Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4x4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | J | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 3270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2194 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 16 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/70/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/70/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A is the more sensible choice for Filipino buyers seeking a rugged, family-oriented SUV at a lower price (₱245k cheaper) with a stronger engine (177 PS vs 170 PS) and an automatic transmission ideal for daily commuting. Its RWD drivetrain suits paved roads and light off-roading, and the 5-seat cabin offers ample space. However, the 2018 model lacks modern features and has a shorter warranty (3 years/100k km). The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4x4, though pricier, is better for those needing serious off-road capability with its 4x4 system and higher torque (405 Nm). It comes with a newer 2023 model, longer warranty (5 years/150k km), but only a manual transmission—less convenient in traffic. If you prioritize value, comfort, and automatic driving, choose the mu-X. For off-road prowess and longevity, pick the Ranger.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱1,964,000, a difference of ₱119,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS, while the Ford Ranger produces 170 PS, so the Isuzu is slightly more powerful. However, the Ford has higher torque (405 Nm vs 380 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission and more comfortable SUV body style. The Ford's manual gearbox may be less convenient in traffic.
Which has a better warranty?
The Ford Ranger offers a longer warranty at 5 years/150,000 km, compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 3 years/100,000 km.