Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022) Honda ₱1,790,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2022 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 178 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 240 Nm @ 1700 - 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.3:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Family Sedan |
| Segment | J | Sedan |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4678 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1802 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1415 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2735 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 47 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Ignite Red Metallic, Morning Mist Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Lunar Silver Metallic, Platinum White Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1337 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/40/ZR18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/40/ZR18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a practical, powerful SUV with diesel efficiency and rear‑wheel drive, the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is the better choice. It costs ₱1,845,000—only slightly higher than the Honda Civic RS Turbo—but offers a 3.0‑liter turbocharged diesel engine that delivers 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Civic’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine with 178 PS and 240 Nm. The mu‑X’s RWD layout, 6‑speed automatic transmission, and larger dimensions (4,825 mm long, 1,860 mm wide) make it more suitable for family trips and occasional off‑road use. The Civic, priced at ₱1,790,000, is a front‑wheel‑drive sedan with a compact 1.5‑liter turbo engine and CVT, better suited for city commuting and fuel economy but lacking the power and space of the mu‑X. Thus, if you need a robust SUV for family or light off‑road use and can afford the modest price premium, choose the Isuzu mu‑X; if you prioritize a stylish sedan for daily city driving and slightly lower cost, the Honda Civic is preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Civic RS Turbo costs ₱1,790,000, while the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT is ₱1,845,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X’s 3.0‑liter diesel engine produces 177 PS, slightly higher than the Civic’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine that also delivers 178 PS, but the mu‑X’s torque (380 Nm) is significantly higher than the Civic’s 240 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Civic’s front‑wheel‑drive layout, CVT transmission, and smaller 1.5‑liter turbo engine make it more fuel‑efficient for city driving, whereas the mu‑X’s larger size and RWD may be less convenient in tight urban traffic.
Which is more practical for family use?
The Isuzu mu‑X offers a 2+3 seating arrangement and larger dimensions, providing more space for passengers and cargo compared to the Civic’s 4‑door sedan layout.