Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,950,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 155 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4740 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 56 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1529 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 17 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 17 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/65R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/65R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | — |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | — |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | Yes | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | Yes | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024): which should you buy?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) and Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) cater to different priorities. At ₱1.845M, the mu-X offers a robust 3.0L turbo-diesel with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, ideal for heavy hauling, off-road, or frequent long drives where diesel efficiency shines. It's a traditional RWD SUV with a 5-seat layout (2+3). However, it’s a 2018 model, so features and tech are dated. The Mazda CX-5, at ₱1.95M, is a 2024 gasoline crossover with 155 PS and 200 Nm, prioritizing refinement, modern design (5 exterior colors), and unibody comfort for daily commuting. It has a 5-seat capacity and FWD. Choose the Isuzu if you need maximum torque, diesel fuel economy, and rugged capability for less money. Choose the Mazda if you want a newer, more stylish, and likely better-equipped vehicle for everyday urban driving, though it costs slightly more. The mu-X is better for towing or rough roads; the CX-5 excels in comfort and handling on pavement.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Isuzu mu-X or Mazda CX-5?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) at ₱1,950,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, both higher than the Mazda CX-5's 155 PS and 200 Nm. The mu-X's diesel engine provides significantly more low-end torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-5 is generally better for daily commuting due to its newer design, unibody construction (smoother ride), and gasoline engine suitable for city driving. The Isuzu mu-X is more suited for heavy-duty use or long highway drives.
Which is more fuel-efficient?
The data does not provide fuel economy figures. However, diesel engines (Isuzu) typically offer better highway fuel efficiency, while gasoline engines (Mazda) may be more efficient in city driving. Actual consumption depends on driving conditions.