Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024) Mazda ₱2,050,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 190 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 252 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4575 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 58 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1644 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | — |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | — |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | Yes | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | Yes | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against capability, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) offers a clear advantage in price and torque. At ₱1,845,000 it is roughly ₱205,000 cheaper than the 2024 Mazda CX‑5 Sport, and its 3.0‑litre turbo‑charged diesel delivers 380 Nm of torque—significantly higher than the CX‑5’s 252 Nm—making it better suited for heavy loads, steep mountain roads, and fuel‑efficient cruising. However, the mu‑X’s power peaks at 177 PS and it is a body‑on‑frame SUV with a 4‑door, 2+3 seating layout, which may feel less refined and offers less passenger capacity than the CX‑5’s five‑seat, unibody crossover design. The Mazda CX‑5, priced at ₱2,050,000, brings a newer model year, a smoother 2.5‑litre naturally aspirated gasoline engine with 190 PS, all‑wheel drive, and a more contemporary premium crossover feel, including multiple exterior colour options. Its 6‑speed automatic and AWD system provide better traction in wet conditions, while the unibody construction typically yields a more car‑like ride and handling. Choose the Isuzu mu‑X if you need a lower‑cost, torque‑rich, diesel SUV for hauling or rugged use and can accept an older platform. Opt for the Mazda CX‑5 if you prefer a newer, more powerful gasoline crossover with AWD, a refined cabin, and five‑seat practicality despite the higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) costs ₱1,845,000, which is about ₱205,000 less than the Mazda CX‑5 Sport priced at ₱2,050,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Mazda CX‑5 Sport produces 190 PS, slightly more than the mu‑X’s 177 PS, but the Isuzu mu‑X delivers far higher torque at 380 Nm versus the CX‑5’s 252 Nm.
Is the Mazda CX‑5 better for daily commuting?
The CX‑5’s newer 2024 model, unibody construction, AWD system and five‑seat layout make it more comfortable and practical for everyday city driving compared with the older, body‑on‑frame mu‑X.
Which vehicle is more suitable for heavy loads or off‑road use?
The Isuzu mu‑X’s larger 3.0‑litre turbo diesel engine and higher torque, combined with its RWD layout, give it better capability for hauling and steep, rugged terrain than the CX‑5’s gasoline AWD setup.