Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2255 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018), the choice hinges on intended use. The mu-X is the clear winner for personal and family use. It offers significantly more power (177 PS vs. 129 PS) and torque (380 Nm vs. 356 Nm), a more convenient 6-speed automatic transmission, and an SUV body style with 4 doors and 5 seats (2+3). It is also ₱260,000 cheaper (₱1,845,000 vs. ₱2,105,000). This makes it ideal for daily commuting, long drives, and occasional light off-roading. The NV350, priced higher, is a 3-door van designed for passenger or cargo transport. It has a manual transmission (5-speed M/T) and lower power output, suited for fleet or commercial use where space and capacity are prioritized over performance and driving ease. While the mu-X provides a more enjoyable and practical everyday vehicle for most Filipino families, the NV350 serves specific business needs. Therefore, the mu-X is generally recommended unless you specifically require a van's interior volume and are willing to accept a manual gearbox and higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Isuzu mu-X or Nissan NV350?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT is cheaper at ₱1,845,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT costs ₱2,105,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X is more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, compared to the Nissan NV350 with 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, higher power, SUV comfort, and lower price.
How many seats does each vehicle have?
The Isuzu mu-X seats 5 (2+3). The Nissan NV350's seating capacity is not specified in the data—only that it has 3 doors.