Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 127 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 356 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5320 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2190 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Upper and lower control arms |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/80R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/80R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers deciding between the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 CX A/T, the choice boils down to intended use. The mu-X (₱1,845,000) is a 5-seater SUV with a powerful 177 PS/380 Nm diesel engine, making it ideal for families who need highway overtaking, off-road capability, and a comfortable ride. In contrast, the Urvan (₱1,880,000) is a 15-seater van with a less powerful 127 PS/356 Nm engine, designed purely for maximum passenger capacity. If you frequently transport large groups or operate a shuttle service, the Urvan's seating is unmatched. However, for daily commuting, power, and versatility, the mu-X offers superior performance and a lower price. The Urvan's body-on-frame construction suggests ruggedness, but the mu-X also rides on a ladder frame and is more suited for mixed driving. Ultimately, choose the mu-X for driving enjoyment and family trips, and the Urvan for people-moving duties.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 CX A/T at ₱1,880,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X is significantly more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm, versus the Nissan Urvan's 127 PS and 356 Nm.
Which seats more passengers?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan seats 15 passengers, while the Isuzu mu-X seats only 5 (2+3 configuration).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its more powerful engine, SUV ride comfort, and lower price. The Urvan is a van intended for mass passenger transport, not ideal for everyday personal use.