Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 127 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 356 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2190 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Upper and lower control arms |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 15 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/70R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 195/70R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 3.0 AT (2018) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 CX M/T (2018), the decision hinges on intended use. The mu-X is a rugged 5-seat SUV with a powerful 177 PS diesel engine, 380 Nm torque, and a 6-speed automatic transmission, making it ideal for daily commuting, long drives, and light off-road use. It offers better driving comfort, higher power, and automatic gearbox convenience. The Urvan, priced slightly lower at ₱1.82M, is a 15-seat van with a 127 PS engine and manual transmission, built for maximum passenger capacity. It suits businesses or large families needing to transport many people. The mu-X is better for a smaller family seeking comfort and power, while the Urvan is for those prioritizing people-moving capacity over driving dynamics. Both have similar warranty and diesel engines, but their body types and seating define their purposes.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Isuzu mu-X or Nissan Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,820,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X at ₱1,845,000, a difference of ₱25,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X is significantly more powerful with 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, compared to the Urvan's 127 PS and 356 Nm torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, higher power, and SUV comfort for up to 5 passengers, whereas the Urvan is a manual van designed for carrying up to 15 people.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan has a much higher seating capacity of 15 passengers, while the Isuzu mu-X seats only 5 (2+3).