Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024) Toyota ₱1,795,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1798cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 122 PS @ 5200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 142 Nm @ 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4460 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1825 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1620 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2640 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 36 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Celestite Gray Metallic, Attitude Black, Red Mica Metallic, Freedom White, Silver Metallic, White Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1385 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/50R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/50R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) and the Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024) depends on your priorities. The mu-X is a rugged, diesel-powered SUV with 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, making it ideal for towing, off-road, or heavy-duty use. It has a 6-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive, and a larger body (4825mm long). However, it’s an older model (2018) and priced higher at ₱1,845,000. The Corolla Cross is a modern hybrid crossover (2024) with 122 PS and 142 Nm, but it excels in fuel efficiency thanks to its hybrid system. It’s ₱50,000 cheaper at ₱1,795,000 and better suited for daily commuting in traffic, with a CVT and front-wheel drive. Its compact size is easier to park and maneuver in the city. If you need raw power and off-road capability, get the mu-X. If you prioritize urban efficiency, modern features, and lower running costs, the Corolla Cross is the smarter choice. Warranty is similar (3 years/100,000 km), but the mu-X has a proven diesel engine while the Corolla Cross offers hybrid tech. Note that the mu-X’s specs lack some details like ground clearance and cargo space, whereas the Corolla Cross is a unibody crossover with more modern safety and infotainment expected (not specified in data).
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Isuzu mu-X or Toyota Corolla Cross?
The Toyota Corolla Cross 1.8 V HEV (2024) is cheaper at ₱1,795,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) at ₱1,845,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm, significantly more than the Toyota Corolla Cross’s 122 PS and 142 Nm. The mu-X is much more powerful, especially for towing or off-road.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Toyota Corolla Cross is better for daily commuting due to its hybrid powertrain (better fuel efficiency in stop-and-go traffic), smaller size for easier parking, and modern 2024 model year. The mu-X is larger and thirstier.
Are there any differences in fuel type?
Yes, the Isuzu mu-X uses diesel, while the Toyota Corolla Cross is a hybrid (gasoline-electric). The hybrid typically offers better fuel economy, especially in the city, but specifics are not provided.