Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,570,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,570,000
Overview
Model Year 2018 2018
Warranty 3-years/100,000km 3-years/ 100,000km
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1898cc 2488cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Compression Ratio 16.5:1 15:1
Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 150 PS @ 3600 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 350 Nm @ 1800 - 2600 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed M/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Van
Segment J Van
Construction Body-on-frame Body on Frame
Doors 5 3
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 15
Length (mm) 4825 4695
Width (mm) 1860 1695
Height (mm) 1840 1990
Wheelbase (mm) 2845 2555
Fuel Tank (L) 65 65
Exterior Colors Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black
Curb Weight (kg) 2076
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone, Coil Springs Torsion Beam
Rear Suspension Multi-Link Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 18 alloy 15 steel
Rear Wheels 18 alloy 15 steel
Front Tires 255/60/R18 195/70/R15
Rear Tires 255/60/R18 195/70/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Type Hydraulic Hydraulic
Steering Column Tilt Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Automatic Climate Control Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes No
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4x2 RZ4E MT and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T depends on your primary need: passenger comfort versus cargo/passenger versatility. Both are priced identically at ₱1,570,000, but they serve very different purposes. The mu-X is a 7-seater SUV with a body-on-frame construction, making it ideal for families who need off-road capability and a more car-like driving experience. It has a more powerful engine (150 PS vs 129 PS) and a 6-speed manual transmission, offering better performance on highways and rough roads. The NV350 Urvan, on the other hand, is a 3-door van designed for maximum interior space, perfect for commercial use, shuttle services, or large groups. It has a larger 2.5L engine with slightly higher torque (356 Nm) at lower RPMs, making it better for hauling heavy loads. However, the Urvan's 3-door configuration and van body may be less convenient for daily family use. If you prioritize passenger comfort, safety, and everyday drivability, choose the mu-X. If you need a workhorse for transporting goods or many people, the Urvan is the better value.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper?

Both vehicles are priced exactly the same at ₱1,570,000.

Which is more powerful?

The Isuzu mu-X has a higher power output of 150 PS compared to the Nissan Urvan's 129 PS. However, the Urvan has slightly higher torque (356 Nm vs 350 Nm) at lower RPMs.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its SUV body, 7-seat capacity, and more powerful engine, offering a more comfortable ride. The Urvan is a van with only 3 doors, making it less convenient for frequent passenger entry/exit.

Which has more seating capacity?

The Isuzu mu-X seats 7 passengers in a 2+3+2 configuration. The Nissan Urvan is a 3-door van; the data does not specify seating capacity, but vans typically seat 12-15 passengers. However, the Urvan's 3-door layout may limit access.