Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱2,174,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2250 |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4905 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 2201 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2900 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Snowflake White Pearl/Arctic White, Absolute Black, Meteor Grey, Aluminum Metallic, Equinox Bronze, Blue Lightning, Sedona Orange |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2201 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 20 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/55/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 255/55/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the 2023 Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T is the better choice overall due to its newer model year, longer warranty (5 years/150,000 km vs. 3 years/100,000 km), and superior torque (405 Nm vs. 380 Nm). Though slightly pricier (₱2,174,000 vs. ₱2,145,000), it offers a more modern package with a 5-door body (easier access to third row) and a more refined 2.0L turbo diesel. The 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT, being 4WD, is ideal for buyers who need off-road capability or frequently tackle rough terrain, as it also has a larger displacement engine. However, its older design, shorter warranty, and 4-door layout make it less practical for urban families. The mu-X's 177 PS is slightly higher than the Everest's 170 PS, but the Everest's higher torque at lower RPMs feels stronger in daily driving. If you prioritize modern features, reliability backed by a long warranty, and predominantly on-road use, pick the Ford Everest. If you need genuine 4WD and a more rugged truck-like SUV, the Isuzu mu-X remains a solid, cheaper alternative.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Isuzu mu-X and Ford Everest?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱2,145,000 compared to the Ford Everest 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) at ₱2,174,000, making it ₱29,000 less expensive.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu-X has slightly more power (177 PS vs. 170 PS), while the Ford Everest has significantly more torque (405 Nm vs. 380 Nm). The Everest's higher torque at lower RPMs provides better pulling power for daily driving.
Which is better for off-road driving?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for off-road because it has a 4WD drivetrain, whereas the Ford Everest is only RWD (rear-wheel drive). For rough terrain or trail driving, the mu-X's 4×4 system gives it a clear advantage.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Ford Everest offers a longer warranty: 5 years or 150,000 km, compared to the Isuzu mu-X's 3 years or 100,000 km. This gives the Everest better long-term coverage.