Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,358,000
Overview
Model Year 2018 2026
Warranty 100,000 km/3-years 3-years/100,000 km
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2999cc 1498cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbo Intercooler Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Max Power 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm 190 PS
Max Torque 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm 240 Nm
Transmission 6-Speed A/T CVT
Drivetrain 4WD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Midsize Crossover SUV
Segment J SUV
Doors 4 5
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4825 4691
Width (mm) 1860 1866
Height (mm) 1840 1681
Wheelbase (mm) 2845 2700
Fuel Tank (L) 65 57
Construction Unibody
Exterior Colors Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl
Curb Weight (kg) 1671
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring
Rear Suspension 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer Multi-link with Coil Spring
Front Wheels 18 Alloy 18
Rear Wheels 18 Alloy 18
Front Tires 255/60 R18 235/60R18
Rear Tires 255/60 R18 235/60R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type Power Asisted EPS
Steering Column Tilt & Telescopic Tilt & Telescope
Tire Pressure Monitoring No Yes
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes Yes
Parking Sensors Yes Yes
Stability Control Yes Yes
Traction Control Yes Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes Yes
Hill Descent Control Yes Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Auto Climate Control System Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Leather
Parking Brake Manual EPB
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes Yes
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes Yes
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes Yes
Remote Trunk Release No Yes
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 7
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No Yes
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality, performance and price, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 3.0 AT emerges as the stronger contender for those prioritizing rugged capability and power. At ₱2,145,000 it is cheaper than the Honda CR‑V by ₱213,000. Its 3.0‑liter turbo diesel engine delivers 177 PS and a hefty 380 Nm torque, far exceeding the CR‑V’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine that produces only 190 PS and 240 Nm. The mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain, higher displacement, and diesel fuel economy make it better suited for off‑road or heavy‑load use, while the CR‑V’s FWD layout and smaller engine favor city driving and lower fuel costs. Both vehicles share a 5‑seat configuration (2+3+2) and similar warranty terms, but the mu‑X’s longer length (4,825 mm vs. 4,640 mm) offers more interior space for cargo or passengers. If your priority is off‑road performance, higher torque and a lower purchase price, the Isuzu mu‑X is the logical choice. If you prefer a modern crossover with a gasoline engine, CVT transmission and slightly more premium styling for urban use, the Honda CR‑V is preferable despite its higher cost. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value rugged power and affordability or a fuel‑efficient, city‑friendly crossover.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Isuzu mu‑X costs ₱2,145,000 while the Honda CR‑V is priced at ₱2,358,000, making the mu‑X cheaper by ₱213,000.

Which vehicle has more power and torque?

The Isuzu mu‑X’s 3.0‑liter turbo diesel engine produces 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, whereas the Honda CR‑V’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine delivers 190 PS and 240 Nm.

Which vehicle is better for off‑road or heavy‑load use?

The Isuzu mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain and higher torque make it more suitable for off‑road or heavy‑load situations compared to the Honda CR‑V’s FWD layout.

Which vehicle is more suitable for city driving and fuel efficiency?

The Honda CR‑V’s smaller gasoline engine, CVT transmission and lower power output make it more city‑friendly and potentially more fuel efficient than the larger diesel mu‑X.