Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,358,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 190 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1681 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 57 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1671 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 7 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 1.5 V Turbo HuNT CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality, performance and price, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 3.0 AT emerges as the stronger contender for those prioritizing rugged capability and power. At ₱2,145,000 it is cheaper than the Honda CR‑V by ₱213,000. Its 3.0‑liter turbo diesel engine delivers 177 PS and a hefty 380 Nm torque, far exceeding the CR‑V’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine that produces only 190 PS and 240 Nm. The mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain, higher displacement, and diesel fuel economy make it better suited for off‑road or heavy‑load use, while the CR‑V’s FWD layout and smaller engine favor city driving and lower fuel costs. Both vehicles share a 5‑seat configuration (2+3+2) and similar warranty terms, but the mu‑X’s longer length (4,825 mm vs. 4,640 mm) offers more interior space for cargo or passengers. If your priority is off‑road performance, higher torque and a lower purchase price, the Isuzu mu‑X is the logical choice. If you prefer a modern crossover with a gasoline engine, CVT transmission and slightly more premium styling for urban use, the Honda CR‑V is preferable despite its higher cost. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value rugged power and affordability or a fuel‑efficient, city‑friendly crossover.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X costs ₱2,145,000 while the Honda CR‑V is priced at ₱2,358,000, making the mu‑X cheaper by ₱213,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu‑X’s 3.0‑liter turbo diesel engine produces 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, whereas the Honda CR‑V’s 1.5‑liter gasoline engine delivers 190 PS and 240 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for off‑road or heavy‑load use?
The Isuzu mu‑X’s 4WD drivetrain and higher torque make it more suitable for off‑road or heavy‑load situations compared to the Honda CR‑V’s FWD layout.
Which vehicle is more suitable for city driving and fuel efficiency?
The Honda CR‑V’s smaller gasoline engine, CVT transmission and lower power output make it more city‑friendly and potentially more fuel efficient than the larger diesel mu‑X.