Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026) Honda ₱2,488,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1993cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 148 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | E-CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4691 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1866 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1681 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 57 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Canyon River Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Grey Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1750 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/60R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 235/60R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Honda CR-V 2.0 VX e:HEV E-CVT (2026): which should you buy?
The 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 and 2026 Honda CR-V e:HEV cater to very different buyers. The mu-X is ₱343,000 cheaper, offers a 3.0L turbo-diesel with 380 Nm torque for serious off-road and towing capability, and seats seven. However, it's a 2018 model with older tech. The CR-V is a 2026 hybrid with a 2.0L e:HEV, delivering 148 PS and excellent fuel efficiency for city driving, but it's FWD and only seats five. Choose the mu-X if you need a rugged, family-sized 4x4 for off-road adventures or heavy loads. Choose the CR-V if you prioritize daily commuting efficiency, modern features, and a smoother ride on paved roads.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 is cheaper at ₱2,145,000 compared to the Honda CR-V e:HEV at ₱2,488,000, a difference of ₱343,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, while the Honda CR-V delivers 148 PS and 183 Nm. The mu-X has higher power and significantly more torque, making it better for towing and off-road driving.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-V e:HEV, being a hybrid with a CVT, is likely more fuel-efficient and smoother for city driving. Its unibody construction also offers a more comfortable ride on paved roads compared to the truck-based mu-X.
Which is better for a large family?
The Isuzu mu-X seats up to 7 passengers (2+3+2 layout) and offers 4WD capability, making it ideal for larger families and outdoor trips. The Honda CR-V only seats 5, so it's more suitable for smaller families or couples.