Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) Mazda ₱1,995,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4395 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1540 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2655 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 51 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Platinum Quartz, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Snowflake White Pearl |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1419 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18" alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 215/55/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 215/55/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024): which should you buy?
The Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (₱1,995,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, especially for daily commuting. Its hybrid powertrain delivers 155 PS of power with 200 Nm of torque, offering better fuel efficiency than the ₱2,145,000 Isuzu Mu-X LS-A 4×4’s 177 PS of power. The CX-30 has 5 doors vs. 4, and a 2+3 interior vs. 2+3+2, giving slightly more versatility. The Isuzu offers a 4WD system, while the Mazda uses AWD. Both have a 6-speed A/T transmission and warranty coverage up to 100,000 km/3 years. Choose the Isuzu if you prioritize rugged off-road capability; opt for the CX-30 if budget and efficiency are top priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV costs ₱1,995,000, which is ₱150,000 less than the ₱2,145,000 Isuzu Mu-X LS-A 4×4.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu Mu-X LS-A 4×4 produces 177 PS vs. 155 PS for the Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV is more efficient for daily commuting due to its hybrid engine producing 200 Nm of torque.
What drivetrain options are available?
The Isuzu Mu-X LS-A 4×4 has 4WD, while the Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV has AWD.