Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024) Mazda ₱2,050,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 190 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 252 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Premium Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4575 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 58 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Jet Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1644 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | — |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | — |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | Yes | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | Yes | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers choosing between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) and Mazda CX-5 2.5L AWD Sport (2024), the decision hinges on intended use and priorities. The mu-X, despite being a 2018 model, still offers a robust 3.0L turbo-diesel engine with 380 Nm of torque (vs. CX-5’s 252 Nm) and a 4WD system, making it ideal for off-road adventures, towing, or hauling heavy loads. Its 7-seat capacity (2+3+2) suits large families. However, it is priced higher at ₱2,145,000 and is older, so expect dated interior tech and lower on-road comfort. In contrast, the CX-5 is a 2024 model with a modern, premium crossover design, unibody construction, and a more powerful gasoline engine (190 PS vs. 177 PS). Its AWD provides decent all-weather capability while offering better ride quality and fuel efficiency (though fuel economy data is not provided). At ₱2,050,000, it is ₱95,000 cheaper and seats 5. For daily commuting, city driving, and on-road refinement, the CX-5 is the smarter choice. For off-road, towing, or needing 7 seats, the mu-X remains a capable workhorse despite its age.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more affordable?
The Mazda CX-5 is cheaper at ₱2,050,000 compared to the Isuzu mu-X at ₱2,145,000, a difference of ₱95,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX-5 produces 190 PS, while the Isuzu mu-X makes 177 PS, so the CX-5 has more horsepower.
Which has more torque?
The Isuzu mu-X generates 380 Nm of torque, significantly more than the Mazda CX-5’s 252 Nm, giving it stronger low-end pulling power.
Which is better for large families?
The Isuzu mu-X seats 7 (2+3+2), while the Mazda CX-5 seats only 5, so the mu-X is better for larger families.