Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda MX-5 Soft Top 2.0-L MT Black Top Black Leather (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda MX-5 Soft Top 2.0-L MT Black Top Black Leather (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Mazda MX-5 Soft Top 2.0-L MT Black Top Black Leather (2024) Mazda ₱2,330,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 184 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 205 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Manual 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible Roadster |
| Segment | J | Roadster |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 3915 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1735 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1230 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2310 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Jet Black, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Machine Grey, Eternal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1095 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 17 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 205/45R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 205/45R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mazda MX-5 Soft Top 2.0-L MT Black Top Black Leather (2024): which should you buy?
These two vehicles serve entirely different purposes. The Isuzu mu-X is a practical 7-seater SUV with a torquey diesel engine (380 Nm), 4WD, and automatic transmission, ideal for families, off-road adventures, and daily commuting in the Philippines. It's priced at ₱2,145,000, significantly cheaper than the Mazda MX-5, which is a 2-seater roadster with a gasoline engine (205 Nm), rear-wheel drive, and manual transmission. The MX-5 offers a thrilling driving experience but lacks practicality and cargo space. If you need space, durability, and all-weather capability, choose the mu-X. If you want pure driving fun and are willing to sacrifice practicality, pick the MX-5. Note that the mu-X is a 2018 model with a shorter warranty (3 years/100,000 km) versus the 2024 MX-5's 5-year warranty. Buyers should also consider that the mu-X is more fuel-efficient for long drives due to its diesel engine, while the MX-5 is better for weekend joyrides.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱2,145,000 compared to the Mazda MX-5 Soft Top 2.0-L MT (2024) at ₱2,330,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mazda MX-5 has a higher power output of 184 PS vs. the mu-X's 177 PS. However, the mu-X has much higher torque (380 Nm) than the MX-5 (205 Nm), making it better for towing and off-roading.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its spacious 7-seat cabin, comfortable ride, and durable diesel engine. The Mazda MX-5 is impractical with only 2 seats and limited cargo space.
Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient?
The Isuzu mu-X uses a diesel engine, which typically offers better fuel efficiency than the MX-5's gasoline engine, especially on long drives. However, exact fuel economy figures are not provided in the data.