Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 A/T (2021)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 A/T (2021) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 A/T (2021) Toyota ₱2,364,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2021 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2755cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 204 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 500 Nm @ 1600 - 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | J | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5325 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1900 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1845 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 3085 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Emotional Red, Super White II, Attitude Black Mica |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2165 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 265/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 265/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 A/T (2021): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing an SUV versus a pickup, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 (2018) and the Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 (2021) differ mainly in price, power output, body style and seating capacity. The mu‑X costs ₱2,145,000, about ₱219,000 less than the Hilux, making it the more budget‑friendly option. However, the Hilux delivers a stronger 204 PS and 500 Nm of torque, compared with the mu‑X’s 177 PS and 380 Nm, giving it superior pulling power and acceleration, especially useful for heavy loads or steep climbs. The mu‑X is an SUV with a 2+3+2 seating layout, offering up to seven seats for larger families, while the Hilux is a pickup with a 2+3 configuration, better suited for cargo and work‑site utility. Both share a 6‑speed automatic, 4WD drivetrain and diesel engines, and carry the same 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. If you need a family‑oriented vehicle with more passenger space and a lower upfront cost, the Isuzu mu‑X is the logical choice. If you prioritize higher power, greater payload capacity and a work‑oriented pickup platform, the Toyota Hilux justifies its higher price for those demands.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 (2018) is priced at ₱2,145,000, which is ₱219,000 less than the Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest 4×4 (2021) priced at ₱2,364,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Hilux 2.8 Conquest produces 204 PS and 500 Nm of torque, whereas the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A delivers 177 PS and 380 Nm, making the Hilux the more powerful option.
What are the seating differences?
The Isuzu mu‑X is an SUV with a 2+3+2 (seven‑seat) layout, while the Toyota Hilux is a pickup with a 2+3 (five‑seat) configuration.
Which model is better for cargo or work use?
The Toyota Hilux, being a pickup with a body‑on‑frame construction, is better suited for cargo and work‑site tasks, whereas the Isuzu mu‑X focuses on passenger capacity.