Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 | Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT (2023) Toyota ₱1,991,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1987cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 186 PS (Combined) |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 188 Nm @ 4400 - 5200 rpm (Combined) |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4755 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1850 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2850 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 52 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Blackish Brown Mica, Dark Steel Mica |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1665 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/50R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/50R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) vs Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT (2023): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) and the Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT (2023) hinges on intended use. The mu-X, at ₱2,145,000, is a rugged 4WD diesel SUV with 380 Nm torque, ideal for off-road adventures, towing, or rough provincial roads. However, it’s a 2018 model with lower power (177 PS) and higher fuel consumption. In contrast, the Zenix is newer (2023), cheaper at ₱1,991,000, and offers a hybrid powertrain delivering 186 PS combined, promising better fuel economy for city driving. It’s a front-wheel-drive MPV with a unibody construction, more car-like handling, and a modern interior. If you frequently tackle rough terrain or need maximum torque for hauling, choose the mu-X. For daily commuting, family use, and lower running costs, the Zenix is the smarter pick. Both seat 7, but the Zenix has a 2+2+3 layout for easier third-row access. Ultimately, the mu-X is a capable workhorse, while the Zenix excels in efficiency and modernity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Zenix 2.0 Q Hybrid CVT is cheaper at ₱1,991,000, while the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT is ₱2,145,000.
Which one has more power?
The Toyota Zenix has 186 PS combined output, higher than the Isuzu mu-X's 177 PS. However, the mu-X has significantly more torque (380 Nm vs 188 Nm), making it stronger for heavy loads and off-road.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Toyota Zenix is better for daily commuting due to its hybrid powertrain, which offers better fuel efficiency, and its CVT transmission for smoother city driving. The Isuzu mu-X is a diesel 4WD SUV designed for more rugged use.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Toyota Zenix, being a hybrid, will have superior fuel efficiency compared to the diesel Isuzu mu-X. The mu-X's 3.0L turbo diesel is powerful but less economical in stop-and-go traffic.