Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (2021) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (2021) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (2021) Isuzu ₱1,390,000 | Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 AT (2024) Foton ₱1,398,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Warranty | — | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | — | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1968cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Blue Power Diesel, semi midship weight distribution | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm | 161 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 450 Nm @ 1600 - 2600 rpm | 390 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | — | Pickup |
| Segment | — | Pickup |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Doors | — | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | — | 5 |
| Length (mm) | — | 5340 |
| Width (mm) | — | 1940 |
| Height (mm) | — | 1870 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | — | 3110 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2980 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 76 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | — | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | — | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Front Wheels | — | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 18 |
| Front Tires | — | 265/70R18 |
| Rear Tires | — | 265/70R18 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | — | Yes |
| Differential Lock | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | — | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | — | No |
| Brake Assist | — | No |
| Parking Sensors | — | No |
| Stability Control | — | No |
| Traction Control | — | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | — | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | — | No |
| Hill Start Assist | — | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | — | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | — | No |
| Driver Airbag | — | No |
| Knee Airbag | — | No |
| Passenger Airbag | — | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | — | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Security Alarm | — | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | — | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | No |
| Seat Material | — | Leather |
| Parking Brake | — | EPB |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | — | No |
| Cruise Control | — | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | — | No |
| Paddle Shifters | — | No |
| Reverse Camera | — | No |
| Auto Headlights | — | No |
| Power Windows | — | Yes |
| Power Seats | — | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | — | No |
| Eco Mode | — | No |
| Antenna | — | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Navigation | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | — | Yes |
| Android Auto | — | No |
| USB | — | No |
| AUX Input | — | No |
| AM/FM Radio | — | Yes |
| CD Player | — | No |
| DVD Player | — | No |
| MP3 Playback | — | No |
| iPod Support | — | No |
| SD Card Slot | — | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | — | LED |
| Fog Lights | — | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Keep comparing
Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.
Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (2021) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 AT (2024): which should you buy?
The Isuzu D-Max 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (₱1,390,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. It costs ₱8,000 less than the Foton Thunder (₱1,398,000) and delivers significantly more torque (450 Nm vs 390 Nm) and power (190 PS vs 161 PS). While the Foton offers a 5-year/150,000 km warranty, the D-Max’s 4WD capability and stronger engine make it more versatile for demanding driving conditions. Budget-conscious commuters or those prioritizing raw performance in tough terrain should lean toward the D-Max.