BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 6 years or 150,000 km | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | PHEV | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 271 PS | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 315 Nm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Crossover | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4870 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1950 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1720 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2820 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2130 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 53 | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 255/55R20 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 255/55R20 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Ventilated Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Solid Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
The BYD Tang DM-i and the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT serve very different buyers. The Tang is a modern 2026 midsize crossover SUV with a turbo‑charged 1.5‑L PHEV powertrain that delivers 271 PS and 315 Nm, paired to a 6‑speed automatic and front‑wheel drive. Its unibody construction, five‑door layout and flexible 2+3+2 seating make it a comfortable, tech‑forward family hauler, but it comes at a premium price of ₱2,148,000. In contrast, the APV is a 2015 body‑on‑frame MPV with a naturally aspirated 1.6‑L gasoline engine producing only 91 PS and 127 Nm, mated to a 5‑speed manual and rear‑wheel drive. It seats 3+3+2, is priced at ₱763,000 and carries a shorter 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. If you need higher performance, hybrid efficiency, a newer design and are willing to invest over two million pesos, the BYD Tang is the clear choice for families seeking comfort and future‑proof tech. If budget is the primary concern, you need a simple, rugged people‑mover for city and provincial trips, and can live with modest power, the Suzuki APV offers a far cheaper, utilitarian solution.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV Type II GA MT costs ₱763,000, which is significantly lower than the BYD Tang DM-i’s price of ₱2,148,000.
Which model has more power?
The BYD Tang DM-i produces 271 PS and 315 Nm, far surpassing the Suzuki APV’s 91 PS and 127 Nm.
What are the main differences in drivetrain and transmission?
The Tang uses a front‑wheel‑drive layout with a 6‑speed automatic, while the APV is rear‑wheel‑drive with a 5‑speed manual gearbox.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily commuting in the Philippines?
For daily commuting, the BYD Tang offers a modern PHEV system, higher power and comfort, but at a higher cost; the Suzuki APV provides an affordable, simple gasoline setup that may suit budget‑conscious commuters.