Changan Eado Plus 1.5L Lite DCT (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Changan Eado Plus 1.5L Lite DCT (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Changan Eado Plus 1.5L Lite DCT (2026) Changan ₱750,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1499cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | 16-Valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 145 Nm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Family Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Sedan | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | White, Black, Andean Grey, Titanium Silver Grey, | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4730 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1505 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1275 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 53 | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16 Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 205/50R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 205/50R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | — | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | — | No |
| Hill Start Assist | — | No |
| Hill Descent Control | — | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | — | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | — | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | No |
| Key Type | — | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | — | No |
| Cruise Control | — | No |
| Multi-Info Display | — | No |
| Paddle Shifters | — | No |
| Auto Headlights | — | No |
| Power Seats | — | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | — | No |
| Eco Mode | — | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| Navigation | — | No |
| Apple CarPlay | — | No |
| Android Auto | — | No |
| AUX Input | — | No |
| AM/FM Radio | — | Yes |
| CD Player | — | Yes |
| DVD Player | — | No |
| MP3 Playback | — | No |
| iPod Support | — | No |
| SD Card Slot | — | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
| Fog Lights | — | Yes |
Changan Eado Plus 1.5L Lite DCT (2026) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on everyday commuting, fuel‑efficiency and a modern drivetrain, the 2026 Changan Eado Plus 1.5L Lite DCT is the clearer choice. It costs slightly less (₱750,000 vs ₱763,000) and delivers 105 PS and 145 Nm, a noticeable power edge over the 91 PS, 127 Nm Suzuki APV. The Eado’s 7‑speed dual‑clutch transmission and front‑wheel‑drive layout provide smoother city driving and better fuel economy than the APV’s 5‑speed manual rear‑wheel‑drive setup. Its unibody sedan construction offers a more refined ride and easier maneuverability in tight urban streets, while the APV’s body‑on‑frame MPV design is geared toward cargo and larger passenger groups (3+3+2 seats). If you need to transport seven people regularly or haul heavier loads, the APV’s higher seating capacity and rugged frame may be advantageous, but it comes with a lower warranty (3 years/100,000 km) and older 2015 technology. Overall, the Changan Eado Plus suits families or professionals who prioritize modern comfort, better power, longer warranty (5 years/150,000 km), and lower price, whereas the Suzuki APV fits buyers needing maximum passenger capacity and a tougher chassis for occasional cargo duties.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Changan Eado Plus is priced at ₱750,000, which is ₱13,000 less than the Suzuki APV’s ₱763,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Eado Plus produces 105 PS and 145 Nm, while the APV delivers 91 PS and 127 Nm, making the Changan more powerful.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Eado Plus, with its front‑wheel‑drive layout, 7‑speed DCT and sedan body, offers smoother city driving and better fuel efficiency than the APV’s manual RWD MPV setup.
What are the key practicality differences?
The APV seats up to 8 (3+3+2) and has a body‑on‑frame design for heavy loads, whereas the Eado seats 5 in a unibody sedan, providing a more comfortable ride for typical family use.