Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) Chevrolet ₱1,949,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1199cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 137 PS @ 5000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 220 Nm @ 2500 - 4000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Small Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | Crossover | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Sharkskin, Summit White, Cacti Green, Blue Glow Metallic, Jinx Metallic, Tigerlily Metallic, Tripp Metallic, Ziggy Solid, Black Meet Kettle | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4537 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 2035 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1567 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1345 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 50 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/55/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) hinges on your primary need. The Trax is a modern small crossover priced at ₱1,949,000, making it cheaper than the NV350 at ₱2,105,000. It offers higher power (137 PS vs 129 PS) and a more refined 6-speed automatic transmission, ideal for daily commuting and city driving. Its gasoline turbo engine provides smooth, responsive performance. However, the Trax seats only five and has limited cargo space. In contrast, the NV350 is a body-on-frame van with a diesel turbo engine delivering massive torque (356 Nm), perfect for heavy loads, passenger transport, or frequent long-distance travel. Its 5-speed manual transmission suits those comfortable with shifting. The older 2018 model has a shorter warranty (3 years vs 5 years) and lacks modern features. Therefore, choose the Trax for a daily driver with style and efficiency; choose the NV350 if you need a robust people/cargo mover with diesel torque.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Trax 1.2 RS (2024) is cheaper at ₱1,949,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) at ₱2,105,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Chevrolet Trax produces 137 PS, slightly more than the NV350's 129 PS. However, the NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 220 Nm), making it stronger for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Trax is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, automatic transmission, gasoline engine for quieter operation, and modern features. The NV350 is larger, manual-only, and diesel, which may be less convenient in traffic.
Which vehicle is more suitable for large families or cargo?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is designed as a van with a body-on-frame construction, offering more seats (typically 12+ passengers) and cargo capacity. The Trax is a 5-seat crossover with limited space.