Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 394 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 676 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4713 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1881 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1627 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2984 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2084 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/55R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers deciding between the Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) and the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025), the choice hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Mach-E is significantly cheaper at ₱3,499,000 versus ₱4,806,000, delivers higher electric power (394 PS, 676 Nm) with instant torque, and is ideal for daily commuting in the city due to its unibody construction, lower running costs (electric), and 5-seat capacity. In contrast, the Prado offers a body-on-frame chassis, 7 seats (2+3+2), and a gasoline turbocharged engine (281 PS, 430 Nm) with 4WD, making it better for off-road adventures and larger families. The Mach-E excels in urban efficiency and performance, while the Prado provides ruggedness and space for extended trips. Choose the Mach-E for a modern, cost-effective EV experience; choose the Prado if you need a durable, family-oriented SUV for challenging terrains.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is cheaper at ₱3,499,000, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado costs ₱4,806,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has more power with 394 PS and 676 Nm of torque, compared to the Prado's 281 PS and 430 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain, which offers lower running costs and instant torque, plus a more car-like unibody ride.
Which vehicle seats more passengers?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado seats 7 passengers (2+3+2) while the Ford Mustang Mach-E seats only 5 (2+3).