Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1996cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4x4 | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2194 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 255/70/R16 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70/R16 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
If you need a rugged, off‑road capable workhorse that can handle heavy loads and uneven terrain, the 2023 Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T is the better choice. It comes with a 4‑wheel drive system, a higher torque output of 405 Nm (vs. the NV350’s 356 Nm), and a newer model year with a longer warranty of 5‑years/150,000 km. Its price is ₱1,964,000, slightly lower than the ₱2,105,000 Nissan NV350. However, if your priority is a spacious van for family or commercial use with 3 doors and a more powerful engine displacement (2,488 cc), the NV350 offers a larger engine but less torque and no 4‑wheel drive. It also has a shorter warranty of 3‑years/100,000 km and is a rear‑wheel drive. In short, choose the Ranger for off‑road work and durability; choose the NV350 if you need a van with more engine displacement for on‑road passenger or cargo use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T is priced at ₱1,964,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT is priced at ₱2,105,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ranger produces 170 PS at 3,500 rpm, whereas the NV350’s engine delivers 129 PS at 3,200 rpm.
Which vehicle is better for off‑road use?
The Ranger has a 4×4 drivetrain and higher torque (405 Nm) compared to the NV350’s RWD and 356 Nm, making it more suitable for off‑road or heavy‑load tasks.
Which vehicle offers a longer warranty?
The Ranger comes with a 5‑year/150,000 km warranty, while the NV350 offers a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty.