Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1996cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2283 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 255/65/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/65/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (₱1,964,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, particularly those prioritizing practicality and budget efficiency. Its 6-speed automatic transmission and 4-door configuration offer greater comfort for daily use compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan’s 5-speed manual and 3-door design. While the NV350 offers higher torque (356 Nm vs. 405 Nm), the Ranger’s 170 PS output paired with easier transmission operation makes it more practical for varied driving conditions. The NV350’s 2.5-liter engine also reflects newer technology, but the Ranger’s lower price point (₱101,000 cheaper) and simpler operation align better with budget-conscious owners. For daily commuting, the Ranger’s seating (2+3) and transmission make it more practical than the NV350’s limited capacity (3 doors). The choice depends on whether budget outweighs convenience, with the NV350 appealing to those valuing raw torque and durability in a different segment.