Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT (2022) Honda ₱1,990,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2022 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1993cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Diesel |
| Max Power | 384 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 497 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Family Sedan | Van |
| Segment | Sedan | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Ignite Red Metallic, Morning Mist Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Lunar Silver Metallic, Platinum White Pearl | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4681 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1802 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1415 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2735 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1432 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 235/40ZR18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 235/40ZR18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT (2022) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018), the choice hinges on purpose and budget. The Civic is priced at ₱1,990,000, slightly cheaper than the Urvan’s ₱2,105,000. It offers a powerful hybrid powertrain (384 PS, 497 Nm) in a family sedan body with 5 seats and FWD layout, ideal for daily commuting, city driving, and fuel efficiency. The Urvan is a diesel van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, built on a body‑on‑frame chassis for heavier duty use, featuring 3 doors and RWD. If you need a versatile passenger car with modern hybrid technology and lower operating costs, the Civic is the better pick. If you require a van for cargo or group transport and can accept lower power and diesel fuel, the Urvan is more suitable. Both share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and are currently available.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Civic RS eHEV E-CVT costs ₱1,990,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT is ₱2,105,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Civic’s hybrid engine delivers 384 PS and 497 Nm, whereas the Urvan’s diesel engine produces 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Civic, with its hybrid powertrain, FWD layout, and sedan body, is more suited for daily commuting and fuel efficiency.
Which vehicle offers more practicality for cargo?
The Urvan, being a van with body‑on‑frame construction and 3 doors, is better suited for cargo or group transport.