Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) Isuzu ₱2,670,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2025 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 450 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | SUV | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Eiger Grey, Satin Pearl White, Mercury Silver, Splash White, Onyx Black | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1870 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1825 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2825 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2700 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with coil spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/50R20 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50R20 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×4 AT (2025) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
The Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑E 4×4 AT (2025) is best for buyers who need a modern, high‑performance SUV for family or adventure use. It costs ₱2,670,000, about ₱565,000 more than the older Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium, but it delivers 190 PS and 450 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm. The mu‑X’s turbo‑charged 3.0‑L inline‑four, 6‑speed automatic, and permanent 4WD give it superior power, drivability and off‑road capability, while its midsize crossover SUV body‑on‑frame construction offers a more refined ride and five doors for easier access. In contrast, the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan is a utilitarian van priced at ₱2,105,000, with a smaller 2.5‑L engine, 5‑speed manual, and rear‑wheel drive, making it less powerful but still adequate for cargo or passenger transport. Its three‑door layout limits side‑entry, but it provides a spacious interior for up to seven seats. Both carry a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. Choose the Isuzu mu‑X if you value performance, all‑weather capability, and SUV comfort; opt for the Nissan Urvan if you need a lower‑cost, high‑capacity van for commercial or large‑family hauling and can accept lower power and manual transmission.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium is cheaper at ₱2,105,000 compared to the Isuzu mu‑X at ₱2,670,000.
Which model has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X produces 190 PS and 450 Nm, while the Nissan Urvan delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm, making the mu‑X significantly more powerful.
Is the Isuzu mu‑X suitable for off‑road use?
Yes, the mu‑X features a 4WD drivetrain and higher torque, which are better suited for off‑road or adverse weather conditions.
Which vehicle is better for large‑family or commercial transport?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan, with its van body style, three doors and higher seating capacity, is more practical for transporting many passengers or cargo, despite its lower power.