Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,510,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16V | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 13:1 | 15:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6,000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4,000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | Hatchback | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Soul Red Metallic | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4460 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1440 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2725 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1348 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 51 L | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Brakes | Ventilated Discs | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Solid Discs | Drum |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | — | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | — | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | — | 195/70/R15 |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control, Dual-Zone | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather Seats | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Electric Parking Brake | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12-Speaker BOSE® Sound System | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T serve completely different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your needs. The Mazda 3 Fastback is a stylish, sporty hatchback ideal for daily commuting and personal use. It offers a more powerful gasoline engine (155 PS) with a smooth 6-speed automatic transmission, front-wheel drive, and a modern unibody construction. However, it seats only 5 and has limited cargo space. The Nissan NV350 Urvan, despite being older (2018 model) and more expensive (₱1,570,000 vs ₱1,510,000), is a rugged body-on-frame van designed for maximum practicality. Its diesel engine produces less power (129 PS) but significantly more torque (356 Nm) from low revs, making it excellent for carrying heavy loads or multiple passengers. The Urvan has a 5-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive. While the Mazda offers better driving dynamics and fuel efficiency (likely), the Nissan is the clear choice for families, businesses, or anyone needing to transport people or goods. The Mazda also has a longer warranty (5 years vs 3 years). In summary: choose the Mazda for style and spirited driving; choose the Nissan for utility and passenger/ cargo capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport is cheaper at ₱1,510,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000, a difference of ₱60,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda 3 produces 155 PS and 200 Nm of torque, while the Nissan NV350 produces 129 PS but 356 Nm of torque, so the Mazda has more horsepower, but the Nissan has much more torque for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 Fastback is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, automatic transmission, and gasoline engine that provides responsive power. The NV350 is a large van with a manual transmission, making it less convenient for city driving.
Which is more practical for a family?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is far more practical for a family or group, with a van body that can seat up to 15 passengers (though data states 3 doors and 2+3 seating? Actually, it's a van so multiple rows), while the Mazda seats only 5. The Urvan also has a diesel engine with high torque for carrying heavy loads.