Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,510,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 5 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Family Sedan | Van |
| Segment | Sedan | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Jet Black, Sonic Silver, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Crystal Blue | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4660 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1445 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1373 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 51 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/45R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018), the decision hinges entirely on lifestyle and needs. The Mazda 3 is a stylish, modern family sedan priced at ₱1,510,000, making it ₱60,000 cheaper than the NV350. It delivers more horsepower (155 PS vs 129 PS) with a smooth 6-speed automatic transmission, ideal for daily commuting and city driving. Its 5-year warranty and contemporary features (like more exterior color options) suit those who prioritize comfort, fuel efficiency (gasoline), and a car-like driving experience. In contrast, the NV350 is a body-on-frame van with a turbocharged diesel engine producing 356 Nm of torque, suited for heavy loads and frequent trips on rough roads. Its manual transmission and RWD drivetrain are practical for commercial use or large families needing maximum cargo and passenger space. However, it’s older (2018 model), has a shorter 3-year warranty, and lacks the car-like amenities of the Mazda. Choose the Mazda 3 for daily driving and style; choose the NV350 for utility, payload, and ruggedness.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: the Mazda 3 Sedan or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport is cheaper at ₱1,510,000, compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000 — a difference of ₱60,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Mazda 3 produces more horsepower (155 PS) than the NV350 (129 PS), but the NV350 has significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 200 Nm) thanks to its turbo diesel engine, making it better for hauling and climbing.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 Sedan is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, more responsive gasoline engine, and car-like comfort. The NV350, with its manual gearbox and diesel engine, is less refined for traffic-heavy city drives.
Which is more practical for cargo or family use?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is far more practical for cargo and large families, with its van body-on-frame construction, diesel torque, and high seating capacity. The Mazda 3 is a sedan limited to 5 persons and moderate trunk space.