Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) Mazda ₱1,600,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,570,000
Overview
Model Year 2022 2018
Warranty 3-years/100,000 km 3-years/ 100,000km
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2999cc 2488cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 190 PS @ 3600 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 450 Nm @ 1600 - 2000 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed A/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Compression Ratio 15:1
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Pickup Van
Segment Pickup Van
Construction Body-on-frame Body on Frame
Exterior Colors Concrete Gray, Gun Blue Metallic, Rock Gray, True Black, True Silver Ignot, Volcanic Red Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black
Doors 4 3
Seating Capacity 2+3 15
Length (mm) 5280 4695
Width (mm) 1870 1695
Height (mm) 1785 1990
Wheelbase (mm) 3125 2555
Curb Weight (kg) 1945 2076
Fuel Tank (L) 76 65
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring Torsion Beam
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 17 15 steel
Rear Wheels 17 15 steel
Front Tires 255/65/R17 195/70/R15
Rear Tires 255/65/R17 195/70/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type Hydraulic Hydraulic
Steering Column Tilt & Telescopic Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes No
Hill Descent Control Yes No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Airconditioning Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls
Rear A/C Vents No No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay Yes No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input No No
AM/FM Radio Yes No
CD Player No No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2022 Mazda BT‑50 4×2 A/T and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T, the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The Mazda BT‑50 costs ₱1,600,000, slightly higher than the Urvan’s ₱1,570,000, but offers a far more powerful 190 PS turbo‑diesel engine with 450 Nm of torque, compared to the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm. This translates to stronger performance for hauling or off‑road tasks, especially with its 6‑speed automatic transmission and RWD layout. The BT‑50’s pickup body‑on‑frame construction and 2+3 seating make it ideal for small business owners who need cargo capacity and occasional passenger space. Conversely, the Urvan, priced marginally lower, provides three doors and a larger passenger‑focused van body, suitable for families or shuttle services that prioritize seating over payload. Both share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and current availability, but the Urvan’s 5‑speed manual may appeal to drivers who prefer more control and lower purchase cost. In summary, choose the Mazda BT‑50 if you need higher power, automatic transmission, and cargo versatility; opt for the Nissan NV350 Urvan if you prioritize passenger capacity, slightly lower price, and manual driving experience.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T is priced at ₱1,570,000, which is ₱30,000 less than the Mazda BT‑50’s ₱1,600,000 price.

Which model has more power?

The Mazda BT‑50 delivers 190 PS and 450 Nm of torque, whereas the Nissan Urvan produces 129 PS and 356 Nm, making the BT‑50 significantly more powerful.

Is the Mazda BT‑50 better for cargo?

Yes, the BT‑50 is a pickup with a body‑on‑frame design and 2+3 seating, offering dedicated cargo space, while the Urvan is a passenger‑focused van.

Which vehicle has an automatic transmission?

The Mazda BT‑50 comes with a 6‑speed automatic transmission; the Nissan Urvan is equipped with a 5‑speed manual transmission.