Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) Mazda ₱1,600,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2022 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 450 Nm @ 1600 - 2000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Concrete Gray, Gun Blue Metallic, Rock Gray, True Black, True Silver Ignot, Volcanic Red | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5280 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1870 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1785 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3125 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1945 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 76 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 255/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 255/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda BT-50 4×2 A/T (2022) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2022 Mazda BT‑50 4×2 A/T and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T, the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The Mazda BT‑50 costs ₱1,600,000, slightly higher than the Urvan’s ₱1,570,000, but offers a far more powerful 190 PS turbo‑diesel engine with 450 Nm of torque, compared to the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm. This translates to stronger performance for hauling or off‑road tasks, especially with its 6‑speed automatic transmission and RWD layout. The BT‑50’s pickup body‑on‑frame construction and 2+3 seating make it ideal for small business owners who need cargo capacity and occasional passenger space. Conversely, the Urvan, priced marginally lower, provides three doors and a larger passenger‑focused van body, suitable for families or shuttle services that prioritize seating over payload. Both share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and current availability, but the Urvan’s 5‑speed manual may appeal to drivers who prefer more control and lower purchase cost. In summary, choose the Mazda BT‑50 if you need higher power, automatic transmission, and cargo versatility; opt for the Nissan NV350 Urvan if you prioritize passenger capacity, slightly lower price, and manual driving experience.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T is priced at ₱1,570,000, which is ₱30,000 less than the Mazda BT‑50’s ₱1,600,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Mazda BT‑50 delivers 190 PS and 450 Nm of torque, whereas the Nissan Urvan produces 129 PS and 356 Nm, making the BT‑50 significantly more powerful.
Is the Mazda BT‑50 better for cargo?
Yes, the BT‑50 is a pickup with a body‑on‑frame design and 2+3 seating, offering dedicated cargo space, while the Urvan is a passenger‑focused van.
Which vehicle has an automatic transmission?
The Mazda BT‑50 comes with a 6‑speed automatic transmission; the Nissan Urvan is equipped with a 5‑speed manual transmission.