Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) Mazda ₱1,995,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Small Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | Crossover | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Platinum Quartz, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Snowflake White Pearl | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4395 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1540 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2655 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1419 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 51 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/55/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda CX-30 2.0L HEV (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who prioritises modern styling, fuel‑efficiency and on‑road dynamics, the 2024 Mazda CX‑30 2.0L HEV is the better fit. It costs ₱1,995,000, about ₱110,000 less than the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium, and offers a hybrid powertrain that delivers 155 PS and 200 Nm, paired with a 6‑speed automatic and all‑wheel drive—ideal for city driving and occasional trips on varied road conditions. Its small crossover SUV body provides a more contemporary look, five doors, and a 2+3 seating layout suitable for families or small groups, while the unibody construction gives a smoother ride. In contrast, the NV350 is a larger, body‑on‑frame van aimed at commercial or passenger‑transport use, with a turbo‑charged 2.5 L diesel delivering higher torque (356 Nm) but lower power (129 PS) and a 5‑speed manual RWD layout. It seats more passengers and is built for heavy‑load durability, but its higher price, lower fuel efficiency and dated 2018 design make it less attractive for everyday personal use. Choose the Mazda CX‑30 if you want a stylish, efficient, and tech‑savvy crossover for daily commuting and weekend trips; opt for the Nissan NV350 only if you need a rugged, high‑torque van for cargo or large‑group transport.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑30 2.0L HEV is priced at ₱1,995,000, which is ₱110,000 less than the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium priced at ₱2,105,000.
Which model has more power?
The Mazda CX‑30 produces 155 PS, while the Nissan NV350 generates 129 PS, making the Mazda the more powerful unit.
What are the key practical differences?
The CX‑30 is a small crossover SUV with five doors, 2+3 seating and AWD, suited for families and city use; the NV350 is a van with three doors, higher torque (356 Nm) and RWD, designed for commercial or large‑group transport.
Which vehicle is more fuel‑efficient?
While exact fuel‑economy figures are not provided, the CX‑30’s hybrid system and smaller 2.0 L engine suggest better fuel efficiency compared to the diesel‑powered 2.5 L turbo engine of the NV350.