Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,950,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱2,105,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3 years or 100,000 kms | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Automatic | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Premium Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | Crossover | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Soul Red Crystal, Machine Gray, Polymetal Gray, Deep Crystal Blue, and Jet Black | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4740 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1680 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1529 | 2255 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 56 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/Coil Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/65R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | — | No |
| Differential Lock | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Traction Control | — | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | — | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | — | No |
| Hill Descent Control | — | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | — | No |
| Knee Airbag | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | — |
| Key Type | Keyless | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | — | No |
| Auto Headlights | — | No |
| Eco Mode | — | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | — | No |
| CD Player | — | Yes |
| DVD Player | — | No |
| MP3 Playback | — | No |
| iPod Support | — | No |
| SD Card Slot | — | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
| Fog Lights | — | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers, the 2024 Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport is the better choice at ₱1,950,000. It offers a modern, refined crossover SUV with a more powerful 155 PS gasoline engine, smoother 6-speed automatic transmission, and a comfortable unibody construction ideal for daily commuting and family use. The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium is a body-on-frame van with a diesel engine producing 129 PS but significantly more torque (356 Nm), making it better for heavy loads or passenger transport. However, it is older (2018 model), more expensive at ₱2,105,000, and has a manual transmission, which is less convenient in traffic. Unless you specifically need a rugged van for commercial or cargo purposes, the CX-5 provides better value, performance, and everyday usability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-5 2.0L Sport is cheaper at ₱1,950,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium at ₱2,105,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX-5 has a higher power output of 155 PS versus the Nissan NV350's 129 PS. However, the NV350 has more torque (356 Nm vs 200 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-5 is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, car-like handling, and more comfortable unibody construction.
Which has a better warranty?
Both offer a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, but the CX-5 is a 2024 model while the NV350 is a 2018 model, so the remaining warranty may differ.