Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,581,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1499cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Small Crossover SUV | Van |
| Segment | Crossover | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Energetic Yellow, White Pearl, Blade Silver Metallic, Graphite Gray Metallic | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4390 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1810 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1660 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2650 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1250 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 42 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/50/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/50/R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018), the choice hinges on purpose. The Xforce is a modern small crossover SUV priced at ₱1,581,000, featuring a 1.5L gasoline engine (105 PS, 141 Nm) with a CVT and FWD—ideal for daily commuting, light city driving, and style-conscious buyers. It offers a 5-seat layout, unibody construction, and newer tech. In contrast, the NV350 Urvan, at ₱1,570,000, is a body-on-frame van with a 2.5L turbo diesel (129 PS, 356 Nm) and 5-speed manual, boasting high torque perfect for carrying heavy loads (up to 12+ passengers or cargo) and rough roads. The NV350 is cheaper but older (2018 model) and less refined. If you need a reliable people-mover or work vehicle, the Urvan's diesel torque and RWD traction are superior. For a daily driver with better comfort and fuel economy, choose the Xforce. Note: The Xforce has a 2+3 seating capacity while the Urvan likely seats 12+ (data not given).
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T is ₱11,000 cheaper at ₱1,570,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT's ₱1,581,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The NV350 Urvan produces more power (129 PS vs 105 PS) and significantly more torque (356 Nm at low RPM vs 141 Nm), thanks to its turbo diesel engine.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xforce is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, CVT automatic transmission, and gasoline engine that offers smoother, quieter city driving.
Which has a newer model year?
The Mitsubishi Xforce is a 2024 model, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan is a 2018 model, making the Xforce much newer.