Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015)
Suzuki
₱975,000
|
Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,041,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Body on Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 5300 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 2180 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1270 | 1775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT (8-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Suzuki APV Type II GLX MT and the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T hinges on intended use. The APV is a better value for passenger transport: it costs ₱975,000, seats 8 (2+3+3), and has a gasoline engine (91 PS, 127 Nm) suitable for daily commuting and family trips. Its body-on-frame construction offers durability, but it's an older 2015 model with a 5-speed manual. The Tamaraw, at ₱1,041,000, is pricier but packs a modern 2.4L turbo diesel (150 PS, 343 Nm) ideal for hauling heavy cargo or towing. However, it's a 2-seater van with only 2 doors, making it impractical for passengers. Warranty terms are similar (3 years/100,000 km). The APV offers more exterior color options (3 vs 3, but different palette). For daily commuting with a large family, choose the APV for its seating and lower price. For business or cargo needs requiring power and torque, the Tamaraw is the better tool, despite its premium cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV is cheaper at ₱975,000, while the Toyota Tamaraw costs ₱1,041,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Tamaraw is more powerful with 150 PS and 343 Nm from its turbo diesel, compared to the APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm gasoline engine.
Which is better for daily commuting with a family?
The Suzuki APV is better for family commuting as it seats 8 passengers, whereas the Tamaraw only seats 2.
Which is better for cargo or business use?
The Toyota Tamaraw is better for cargo with its higher torque (343 Nm) and van body, designed for hauling goods, while the APV is an 8-seater MPV/AUV primarily for passengers.