Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing daily utility and budget, the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is the superior choice. It offers better practicality with 5 doors and 5 seats compared to the 4-door, 2+3 seating of the 2013 Ford Ranger. While the Ranger is cheaper by ₱120,000, the Xpander is more modern, currently available, and features a unibody construction versus the Ranger's body-on-frame. If power is the priority, the Ranger wins with 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, whereas the Xpander produces only 105 PS and 141 Nm. Ultimately, choose the Xpander for family hauling and modern reliability, or the Ranger if you require higher torque for heavy loads and can afford the higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2013 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT is cheaper at ₱1,219,000 compared to the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT at ₱1,099,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger is more powerful with 120 PS @ 3700 rpm and 285 Nm of torque, while the Mitsubishi Xpander produces 105 PS and 141 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for family commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander is better for family commuting as it has 5 doors and a 2+3+2 seating capacity, whereas the Ford Ranger has only 4 doors and 2+3 seating.
Are both vehicles currently available in the Philippines?
The 2013 Ford Ranger is discontinued, while the 2026 Mitsubishi Xpander is currently available.