Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (2014) Toyota ₱2,453,000 | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6 years or 150,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2362cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | PHEV |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 6000 rpm | 271 PS |
| Max Torque | 224 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 315 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4870 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1950 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1720 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2820 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1775 | 2130 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 53 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Solid Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot brake | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry & Alarm | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against performance, the BYD Tang DM-i 2026 emerges as the more sensible choice for most families and daily commuters. Priced at ₱2.148 million, it is about ₱305,000 cheaper than the discontinued 2014 Toyota Previa, and it comes with a modern 6‑year/150,000 km warranty versus the Previa’s 3‑year/100,000 km coverage. The Tang’s 1.5‑litre turbocharged hybrid powertrain delivers 271 PS and 315 Nm, far outstripping the Previa’s 170 PS and 224 Nm, while still offering fuel‑efficient PHEV operation. Both are front‑wheel drive, but the Tang’s midsize crossover SUV body provides a more contemporary look, higher ground clearance and a 2+3+2 seating layout that suits larger families, whereas the Previa’s van layout (2+2+3) feels dated and its 4‑speed automatic is less refined than the Tang’s 6‑speed automatic. The Tang also benefits from current production, meaning parts and service are readily available, unlike the discontinued Previa. If you need a legacy van for commercial use or prefer a 5‑door van silhouette, the Previa could still work, but for most buyers seeking lower price, stronger warranty, higher power, and modern practicality, the BYD Tang DM‑i is the better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The BYD Tang DM‑i 2026 costs ₱2,148,000, which is about ₱305,000 less than the Toyota Previa’s ₱2,453,000 price.
Which vehicle offers more power?
The BYD Tang DM‑i produces 271 PS and 315 Nm, whereas the Toyota Previa delivers 170 PS and 224 Nm.
What are the warranty differences?
The Tang comes with a 6‑year or 150,000 km warranty, while the Previa only offers 3 years or 100,000 km.
Is the Previa still available?
No, the Toyota Previa 2014 is discontinued, whereas the BYD Tang DM‑i is a current 2026 model.