Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (White Pearl) (2014) Toyota ₱860,000 Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015) Suzuki ₱419,000
Overview
Model Year 2014 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-3
Displacement 1497cc 796cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve SOHC 12-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 108 PS @ 6000 rpm 48 PS @ 6200 rpm
Max Torque 142 Nm @ 4200 rpm 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain FWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Segment B A
Construction Unibody Unibody
Doors 4 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3
Length (mm) 4410 3395
Width (mm) 1700 1490
Height (mm) 1475 1475
Wheelbase (mm) 2550 2360
Curb Weight (kg) 745
Fuel Tank (L) 35
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson
Rear Suspension Torsion Beam Multi-link Rigid Axle
Front Wheels 15" Alloys 13" Steel
Rear Wheels 15" Alloys 13" Steel
Front Tires 185/60 R15 145/70 R13
Rear Tires 185/60 R15 145/70 R13
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Standard
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Manual Aircon
Rear A/C Vents No No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display Yes No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 2
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes No
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and spacious sedan with good power-to-price ratio, the Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT is the better choice. It offers more power, better fuel efficiency, and more features than the Suzuki Alto. The Vios also has a longer wheelbase and seating capacity suitable for families.

Frequently asked questions

Which car is cheaper between Toyota Vios and Suzuki Alto?

The Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Deluxe MT is significantly cheaper at ₱419,000 compared to the Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT priced at ₱860,000.

Which car has more power and torque?

The Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT offers more power with a maximum of 108 PS @ 6000 rpm compared to the Suzuki Alto's 48 PS @ 6200 rpm, while both have similar torque levels at 142 Nm and 68 Nm respectively.

Which car is better for daily commuting?

The Toyota Vios 1.5 G MT with its longer wheelbase (4410 mm) and more spacious interior is better suited for daily commuting compared to the Suzuki Alto's shorter dimensions (3395 mm).

Which car has a better warranty?

Both vehicles come with the same warranty of 100,000km/3-years, so there's no difference in terms of warranty coverage.