Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,218,888 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/5-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 203 PS @ 3800 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1882 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3096 | 2775 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Short Long Arms with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Beam Axle with Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 245/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with diesel power and towing capacity, the Chevrolet Colorado seems to be the better choice. It offers more torque and power than the Mitsubishi Xpander, making it suitable for towing heavier loads or rough terrain. The Colorado also has a longer warranty period of 5 years/100,000 km compared to the Xpander's 3-year/100,000 km warranty. For those who prioritize fuel efficiency and a manual transmission, the Mitsubishi Xpander is a better option. Here are some real questions buyers might ask when comparing these vehicles:
"Which vehicle is cheaper?" The Chevrolet Colorado has a lower base price of ₱1,218,888 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's ₱1,099,000.
"Which vehicle is more powerful?" The Chevrolet Colorado boasts 500 Nm of torque at 2000 rpm and a max power of 203 PS @ 3800 rpm, making it significantly more powerful than the Mitsubishi Xpander's 141 Nm of torque.
"Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?" The Mitsubishi Xpander has an FWD drivetrain, which can be more efficient and smoother on city roads compared to the RWD Colorado. Additionally, its manual transmission offers a more direct connection between the driver and the car's performance.
"Which vehicle should I choose if my main concern is fuel efficiency?" The Mitsubishi Xpander with its naturally aspirated engine and 141 Nm of torque can be a better choice for those concerned about fuel efficiency, especially in urban environments.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Colorado has a lower base price of ₱1,218,888 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's ₱1,099,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Chevrolet Colorado boasts 500 Nm of torque at 2000 rpm and a max power of 203 PS @ 3800 rpm, making it significantly more powerful than the Mitsubishi Xpander's 141 Nm of torque.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander has an FWD drivetrain which can be more efficient and smoother on city roads compared to the RWD Colorado. Additionally, its manual transmission offers a more direct connection between the driver and the car's performance.
Which vehicle should I choose if my main concern is fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Xpander with its naturally aspirated engine and 141 Nm of torque can be a better choice for those concerned about fuel efficiency, especially in urban environments.