Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,378,888 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3800 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T, LSD | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4878 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1902 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1831 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | manual airacon | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing an SUV against a pickup, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L (2017) edges out the Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L (2015) in overall value. The Ranger is slightly cheaper at ₱1,328,000 versus ₱1,378,888, and it is currently available, whereas the Trailblazer is not. Both carry the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years) and diesel powertrains, but the Ranger delivers comparable power (160 PS vs 163 PS) with a marginally higher torque band (385 Nm over 1 600‑2 500 rpm versus 380 Nm at 2 {000} rpm). The Ranger’s 6‑speed manual offers smoother gear progression than the Trailblazer’s 5‑speed, and its longer wheelbase (5 277 mm vs 4 878 mm) translates to more interior space for passengers and cargo, especially with its 2+3 seating layout. While the Trailblazer’s body‑on‑frame SUV design may appeal to those preferring a traditional SUV silhouette, the Ranger’s pickup body provides greater versatility for hauling and off‑road work, plus the extra width (2 163 mm) improves stability. Both are rear‑wheel drive with similar warranty coverage, but the Ranger’s current availability, lower price, and more practical dimensions make it the better choice for families or small business owners needing a rugged, everyday workhorse in the Philippines.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L (2017) costs ₱1,328,000, which is ₱50,888 less than the Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L (2015) priced at ₱1,378,888.
Which model offers more torque?
The Ranger provides slightly higher torque at 385 Nm (1 600‑2 500 rpm) compared to the Trailblazer’s 380 Nm at 2 000 rpm.
Is the Trailblazer still available for purchase?
No, the Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.5L (2015) is listed as not available, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak is currently available.
Which vehicle is more practical for cargo and passenger space?
The Ranger’s longer length (5 277 mm) and wider track (2 163 mm) give it more interior room and a versatile 2+3 seating layout, making it more practical for cargo and passenger needs than the Trailblazer’s 5‑door SUV with 2+3+2 seating.