Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LS AT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LS AT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LS AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱998,000 | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1364cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16valve |
| Aspiration | DVCP, Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 140 PS @ 4900 6000 rpm | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1850 4900 rpm | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4245 |
| Width (mm) | 1775 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1708 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2555 | 2521 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber |
| Front Wheels | 16-inch alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16-inch alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/70/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/70/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Cloth |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Power Seats | — | No |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LS AT (2015) vs Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015): which should you buy?
For those looking for a reliable and spacious crossover with good fuel efficiency, the Chevrolet Trax might be the better choice despite its higher price point. The Ford Ecosport is more affordable but offers less power and space.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The data doesn't explicitly state fuel economy figures, so we can only compare maximum torque which indicates potential for good fuel efficiency in both vehicles.
Is the Chevrolet Trax safer than the Ford Ecosport?
Safety features are not mentioned in the provided data. However, considering the construction type (unibody vs body-on-frame), unibody vehicles like the Chevrolet Trax may offer better rollover protection.
Which car has more power and torque?
The Ford Ecosport has less max power at 110 PS compared to the Chevrolet Trax's 140 PS. The Chevrolet Trax also produces more torque at 200 Nm versus the Ford Ecosport's 142 Nm.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Trax, despite its higher price, offers a larger interior space and might be easier to navigate in urban settings compared to the smaller Ford Ecosport.