Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015) Honda ₱913,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 120 PS @ 6,600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 145Nm @ 4,800rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4440 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1477 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2600 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1107 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | H-Shaped Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16x6.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16x6.0 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/55 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Type with Touch Panel Controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Smart Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Multi-Reflector Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | 20.99 |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | 31.03 |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | 26.01 |
| Emission Standard | — | Euro4 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Honda City 1.5 VX CVT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact SUV with good power and fuel efficiency, the Ford Ecosport stands out as the better choice. It offers more horsepower and torque compared to the Honda City, making it more suitable for spirited driving or towing small loads. Additionally, its RWD setup provides better handling in adverse weather conditions. The Ford's 10-year warranty is also a significant advantage.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Ecosport has more power with 110 PS compared to the Honda City which has 120 PS.
Is one of these vehicles better for daily commuting?
Yes, the Ford Ecosport is generally better suited for daily commuting due to its higher horsepower and torque, making it easier to accelerate in traffic and handle various driving conditions.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
The Honda City offers better combined fuel economy at 26.01 km/L compared to the Ford Ecosport's not specified but likely lower figures given its size.
Is one of these vehicles more reliable with a longer warranty?
Yes, the Ford Ecosport has a 10-year/100,000km warranty, which is significantly longer than the Honda City's 3-year/100,000km warranty.