Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 2477cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 8valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 21.1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | AUV |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4420 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1650 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1830 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2620 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1535 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | no |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-2 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a car with decent power and reliability, the Ford Ecosport is recommended over the Mitsubishi Adventure. The Ecosport offers better fuel efficiency and more practicality due to its 5-door hatchback design and seating capacity of 2+3. It also comes at a lower price point of ₱958,000 compared to the Mitsubishi's ₱1,010,000. For those who prioritize power output, the Ecosport with its 147 Nm torque and 110 PS max power is more suitable than the Mitsubishi's 149 Nm torque and 75 PS max power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle should I choose if I value daily commuting convenience over performance?
The Ford Ecosport offers better practicality with its 2+3 seating capacity and 5-door hatchback design, making it more suitable for daily commuting needs.
Is the Mitsubishi Adventure a good choice for someone who wants a larger vehicle with more seats?
Yes, the Mitsubishi Adventure is designed as an 7-seater AUV. However, its practicality might be compromised compared to the Ecosport's 2+3 seating arrangement and hatchback design.
Which car has better fuel efficiency given their similar power outputs?
The Ford Ecosport with a max torque of 142 Nm at 4500 rpm is likely to have better fuel efficiency compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure's max torque of 149 Nm at 2500 rpm.
Which car offers more comprehensive warranty coverage?
Both vehicles offer the same warranty period of 100,000km/3-years, so this is a tie. However, the Ecosport's lower price might be seen as an indirect benefit in terms of potential savings on maintenance costs over time.