Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLX SE MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLX SE MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLX SE MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱952,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 2477cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 8valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 21.1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | AUV |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4420 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1650 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1800 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2620 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1525 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | no |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-2 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLX SE MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with good power-to-price ratio, the Ford Ecosport emerges as the better choice. It offers more power, is less expensive, has a longer warranty, and comes in a more versatile body type. The Mitsubishi Adventure, while powerful, is discontinued and not available anymore.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between Ford Ecosport and Mitsubishi Adventure?
The Ford Ecosport is cheaper at ₱958,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure at ₱952,000.
Which car has more power output?
The Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLX SE MT offers more torque (149 Nm) and slightly higher max power (75 PS @ 4200 rpm) compared to the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (110 PS @ 6300 rpm).
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ecosport is a better choice for daily commuting due to its more powerful engine, longer warranty, and versatile body type suitable for various conditions.
Is the Mitsubishi Adventure available now or has it been discontinued?
The Mitsubishi Adventure is no longer available as it was discontinued.